Thomson Reuters has secured a significant fair use victory in their AI copyright infringement case against Ross Intelligence, marking a crucial development in AI-related copyright law.

The case revolves around Ross Intelligence allegedly using protected content from Thomson Reuters' Westlaw legal database to create an AI-powered law search engine. Judge Stephanos Bibas issued a summary judgment ruling that strongly favors Thomson Reuters' position.

Key Ruling Points:

• Thomson Reuters' headnotes were deemed original, copyrightable works
• The judge compared legal editorial work to sculpture, where selecting what to preserve creates protected content
• Ross's use was determined non-transformative as it aimed to create a market substitute
• Of 2,830 examined headnotes, 2,243 showed "actual copying"

Important Context: The ruling specifically addresses non-generative AI, with Judge Bibas explicitly noting that generative AI was not considered in this case. This distinction is crucial for ongoing AI copyright disputes in other industries, particularly music and publishing.

Implications for Other Industries: While this ruling strengthens copyright holders' positions, its application to generative AI cases may be limited. Music industry cases, especially those involving AI-generated content, face different challenges in proving direct copying and establishing fair use violations.

The verdict offers valuable precedent for copyright protection in AI cases while highlighting the need for specific legal frameworks addressing generative AI technologies.

This ruling marks a significant milestone in AI copyright law, though its broader implications for generative AI cases remain to be seen as technology and legal frameworks continue to evolve.

Related Articles

Previous Articles