Live Nation has previewed its dismissal arguments in response to the Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit, focusing on three main points to challenge the allegations.

The company directly confronts the DOJ's tying claims, which assert that Live Nation illegally requires artists to use its promotion services when booking its amphitheaters. Live Nation argues this mischaracterizes the industry dynamics and actually describes a refusal to deal with competitors rather than illegal tying.

Key arguments in Live Nation's preview:

1. The complaint "muddles the roles" of industry participants and mischaracterizes Live Nation's business practices
2. Claims from 30 states joining the lawsuit are "threadbare and conclusory" without specific details about alleged harm
3. Many state-level claims may be time-barred due to statutes of limitations, with the longest being six years

Live Nation emphasizes that the Obama administration approved the Ticketmaster merger in 2010, and the Trump administration allowed it to continue under an existing consent decree. The trial is expected no earlier than 2026, well after the upcoming presidential election.

The case represents one of several challenges facing Live Nation, with potential significant implications for the live entertainment industry's future structure.

Related Articles

Previous Articles