Major record labels and indie sector representatives are strongly opposing a UK government proposal that would allow AI companies to train their models on copyrighted works without explicit permission from rightsholders.

Universal Music's Lucian Grainge, Sony Music's Rob Stringer, and Warner Music's Robert Kyncl have criticized the framework, which would implement an opt-out system for copyright holders rather than requiring explicit consent for AI training.

Key concerns from industry leaders:

• The proposal compromises intellectual property rights and music monetization
• The UK "stands at a decisive crossroads" regarding IP protection (Grainge)
• The framework would be "very detrimental" to the music industry (Kyncl)
• Creators must be fairly compensated for AI use of their work (Stringer)

Association of Independent Music (AIM) CEO Gee Davy warns that this exception would "put Britain in a race to the bottom." Independent music businesses support AI innovation but not at the expense of musicians' livelihoods.

Industry recommendations:

• Replace opt-out system with automatic training safeguards for creators
• Amend the UK's Data Bill to strengthen copyright protections
• Create frameworks for mutual growth between music industry and AI developers

The proposal has faced additional opposition from prominent artists including Paul McCartney and Elton John, along with various organizations and lawmakers. The consultation period for this proposal ended February 25th.

While the UK grapples with these regulations, similar discussions continue in other regions, particularly regarding fair use definitions and AI training rights in the United States.

Related Articles

Previous Articles