Federal Judge Opens Eight Mile Style vs. Spotify Case Files - Oral Argument Date Confirmed
A federal judge has unsealed the docket in the ongoing copyright infringement case between Eight Mile Style (Eminem's publisher) and Spotify, revealing significant developments in this landmark music industry lawsuit.
Eminem in black jacket and cap
Key Case Details:
- Original complaint filed in August 2019
- Involves alleged infringement of 240+ Eight Mile compositions
- Harry Fox Agency (HFA) added as co-defendant in 2020
- Spotify brought Kobalt in as third-party defendant
- Billions of cumulative streams involved
Core Arguments:
- Eight Mile Style claims Spotify failed to obtain proper licensing since launch
- Claims include both pre-Music Modernization Act (MMA) direct license and Section 115 compulsory license violations
- Eight Mile argues Spotify isn't entitled to MMA liability protection
- HFA allegedly issued invalid backdated notices of intent for compulsory licenses
- Dispute over Kobalt's role as collection agent vs. administrator
Recent Developments:
- Both sides have filed for summary judgment
- Multiple expert testimonies face striking motions
- Parties continue submitting sealed filings
- Oral argument scheduled for July 12
The case raises fundamental questions about music licensing, streaming rights, and the constitutionality of the Music Modernization Act, prompting involvement from the Justice Department.
Eminem wearing gray hoodie, close-up
The outcome of this case could set important precedents for digital streaming rights and music licensing practices in the industry.
Related Articles
Artist Partner Group Files Lawsuit Against Create Music Over Artist Contract Interference
