Anthropic Defends AI Training Methods, Cites 'Broad Safeguards' Against Music Copyright Infringement
Anthropic has filed a strong opposition to major music publishers' preliminary injunction request regarding their AI chatbot Claude's alleged copyright infringement. The dispute centers on two main issues: the use of protected works in training data and the generation of song lyrics by Claude.
Circuit board with AI processor
Key points from Anthropic's opposition:
- Fair Use Defense
- Claims using copyrighted works to train LLMs constitutes fair use
- Argues training data usage is "transformative" under fair use doctrine
- States monetary damages would suffice if publishers prevail
- Technical Context
- Claude learns from "trillions of tiny textual data points"
- Training data likely includes some copyrighted works
- Research details predated Claude's commercial release by nearly a year
- Protective Measures
- Implemented "broad array of safeguards" to prevent copyright infringement
- Claims no reasonable expectation of future violations
- Disputes ongoing market and licensing harm allegations
Anthropic co-founder Jared Kaplan provided additional support through a declaration detailing Claude's training specifics. The court recently granted and denied partial redactions to the opposition filing, with some details (including compliance costs) remaining confidential.
The case (5:24-cv-03811) remains ongoing, with reports suggesting a significant portion may be dismissed in the near future. This dispute represents a crucial test case for AI training data and copyright law.
3D blue AI text on abstract
Anthropic logo on black background